Effective searching Archives - Page 9 of 9

May 24, 2011 By Helen Brown Leave a Comment

What’s in store for philanthropy?

Because most of us spend our time in the trenches researching, cultivating, asking, stewarding and reporting, it’s nice to spend an afternoon with someone who surveys the landscape from higher terrain and focuses in on objects and trends that we need to know about.

Last week Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, spoke at a Women in Development of Greater Boston (WID) event. Palmer gave her picks for the “Top Ten Trends in Philanthropy” and predicted what we’re going to see more of in the months ahead.

Some things that captured my attention and imagination were:

The changing relationship between government and nonprofits regarding taxation…

With the recent strain on the economy coupled with consumers’ growing concern over the efficacy of nonprofit organizations, it was just a matter of time before government officials started debating a larger fee structure for PILOT (Payment In Lieu of Taxes) programs (or changing tax codes to include nonprofits). In Boston, where over half of the land is owned either by nonprofits or the government, PILOT payments are an important source of a struggling city’s tax revenue. There’s a good overview of the discussion here at the Inside Higher Ed site, and Palmer predicted more developments to come on this issue in the months ahead.

… and government investment in programs via social impact bonds.

A recent import from the UK is the creation of social impact bonds (brief article here from the NYT). Social impact bonds work like this: Private investors give the seed funding for a nonprofit organization/venture. If the nonprofit meets its stated goals, the investors get paid back with interest by the government at the end of a designated period. It’s venture funding with a social benefit twist, and it’ll be interesting to see if the program ideas being floated in New York City and Massachusetts get picked up. If you’re interested, there’s more information about social impact funds in a white paper written by Harvard economist Jeffrey Liebman.

The impact of technology in fundraising

From robot fundraisers on the streets like Don-8er and DONA to the use of Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn for interacting with our constituencies, there’s going to be a continuing explosion of new tools to engage and motivate donors, from small to large. Think that online giving isn’t going to work for large donors? Stacy Palmer told us that last year there were at least nine gifts of $100,000 made online, and that some high net worth donors she’s spoken with said that the only barrier they find to donating online like that is that most organizations’ websites aren’t equipped to accept large donations! Even if you don’t think it’ll ever happen, doesn’t it make sense to act like it could?

Some of Palmer’s other top trends included:

the consolidation/merging together of nonprofits to avoid closure or to gain access to collaborative funding
the rise of giving by women and how the change in demographics is transforming our society
the importance of continuing education, staff retention and morale for nonprofit success.

What trends in philanthropy do you see? What do you think is in store for us?

May 16, 2011 By Helen Brown 5 Comments

When Google starts acting like HAL

Stuff gets filtered to suit our particular likes and dislikes all the time. It’s why I don’t get any catalogs for fly-fishing lures or (alas) equestrian apparel. Once I randomly got put on a list for private-plane owners, which was fun for a time (and then slightly depressing). I have long appreciated this filtering for the recycling-center trips it saves me.

However, last week Sacha Dichter wrote an interesting blog post about information filtering that kind of disturbed me. In the article, Dichter discussed a related phenomenon that concerned him: news outlets and information sources becoming so polarized that we have to remind ourselves to specifically seek out opinions that differ from ours in order to be well-rounded people. We need to purposefully consume sources that strive for balance or seek out those that challenge our thinking or opinions. It’s really good advice.

It wasn’t what Dichter wrote that disturbed me, though; it was this jaw-dropping TED Talk by Eli Pariser that he embedded, talking about online filtering:

If you can, and especially if you are a professional researcher, please take nine short, engaging minutes to watch this video.

How do we avoid missing the important stuff?

It’s not like tailoring information is new. But for those of us who provide information to others for a living, the reality that our web search results are abridged based on what we’ve clicked on previously should make us extra diligent. What are we missing? And how can we avoid myopic results when what we hope to provide is the best-researched information possible?

HAL may have thought of itself as incapable of error but we know how well that turned out
for Dave and the rest of the crew.

A few suggestions

I say this a lot because it bears repeating: if you want the most complete results when you search, you *have* to use more than one search engine. Search engines index many different things and many things differently.

Also, for all kinds of reasons it’s a good idea to empty your cache/browsing history and delete cookies frequently. If you can’t remember to do it every day, set a reminder to do it every Friday at quitting time. Besides unloading your computer hard drive of a lot of junque that you just don’t need clogging up space on your hard drive, there will be that many fewer sites tracking what you are doing online…and remembering those preferences to edit what you are seeing.

For the casual searcher, the rewards of filtering are probably as many as its penalties. For professional searchers, though, having the full array of options to choose from is key.

April 4, 2011 By Helen Brown Leave a Comment

Three Truly Great (FREE!) Fundraising Research Resources

I just finished Tony Hsieh’s highly-recommended book Delivering Happiness, and it’s gotten me thinking about resources for fundraisers/researchers that provide a WOW factor: sources that deliver beyond expectations.

For me, that would be a metasite, or web page that has lots of links and resources of help to users. Here are my top picks in three categories. What are your favorites?

Best Overall Collaborative Metasite

First up I recommend SupportingAdvancement, a Mall of America-sized site with resources for every department in a fundraising office. The site has free templates, report formats, white papers, and training resources useful to everyone, as well as links to research-specific sites and much more. It’s updated daily and thrives on the generosity of its contributors of content and site sponsors. I could go on, but really, you have to see it to believe it.

Best Metasite Created as a Division-Wide Resource (update: link sadly no longer valid because they liked it so much they turned it into an internal-only resource)(!)

This next site is a resource created by the research team at The University of California San Diego for the entire development department. It’s called the Development Office Toolkit and they created it using Google Sites (free!) and linked it to the university’s servers. The site is chock-a-block with information for the whole development office: news of upcoming training classes, pdfs of internal (yet public) reports, how-tos, templates, university event calendars and lots more.

For prospect research specifically, there are pages on ethics and confidentiality policies, information about prospect management and links to lots of research resources, including some niche sources like BloodHorse for finding thoroughbred horse owners.

This is a fantastic example of an internal resource that isn’t just a research department resource, but one created with the needs of the entire division in mind. And since they used Google Sites to make the resource, you can too! It’s a great example for others to follow. Bravo!

Best Metasite For Research-Specific Information

And last but definitely not least, Northwestern University has kept up a comprehensive Research Bookmarks list of several hundred links since the early 1990s, and it is consistently fantastic. Updated monthly from recommendations within the NU research department and from the prospect research community at large, the list is particularly strong with links to international resources including hard-to-find offshore real estate listings. It’s been on my bookmarks list for years and it should be on yours, too, if it isn’t already.

If you have other metasites that you’d like to add to this list, comment below! Let’s crowd-source this!

March 30, 2011 By Rick Snyder 2 Comments

Tips and Tricks for organizing info: staff picks

Here at the Helen Brown Group we are constantly testing new tools and sharing them amongst ourselves. I asked our team leader/director of research Rick Snyder to share some of the ones he uses frequently. Here’s what Rick had to say:

Read It Later (RIL)

The first is a browser add-on called Read It Later (RIL). It works with all browsers and web-enabled phones. I think of it as a way to save bookmarks that don’t really deserve to be bookmarks (RIL calls them bookmarklets). It works across numerous devices, stays in sync, and allows offline reading by downloading pages before you disconnect.

When I first found RIL I was looking into buying a new HDTV. It was all new to me and I was scouring numerous websites on makes and models, user forums and technical articles. I needed a way to manage all of the information but I didn’t want to save all of the sites as bookmarks since my project had a discrete end, at which point I’d no longer need them. Enter RIL. I ended up saving twenty or more bookmarklets but within a couple of weeks I was done and easily deleted them all. Had I added them to my regular bookmarks there’s a good chance that they would sit there for years before getting pruned out.

It’s easy to see how this is useful in the research world. In the course of an average day any researcher will view dozens of websites. Most of them merit a quick view and then you’re done. You’ll want to come back to others but maybe it’s the end of the workday and you need to save them to return to the following day. Or maybe you’re going to continue your work on a different computer and want to be able to access the pages from there. RIL helps you to save your work without cluttering up your list of “real” bookmarks.

SearchTeam

Another tool that I’ve been playing with is called SearchTeam. SearchTeam is a collaborative search engine. It allows multiple people working on the same project to see the results of everyone else’s searches in real time. You can create a SearchSpace and invite friends and colleagues to join the search with you. You can share comments, chat in real time, upload files, and more.

As with Read It Later, I came across SearchTeam while working on a personal project and then brought it into my work life. I’m planning a two-week motorcycle tour of Nova Scotia this summer. My riding buddy lives in Brooklyn and I live in Maine. By setting up a Nova Scotia SearchSpace we are able to see each others’ searches, leave comments and chat when we’re online at the same time. It keeps us from duplicating efforts and by seeing each others’ searches it is spurring us to think of things that each of us may not have come up with alone.

Since much of the work we do in prospect research is solitary in nature, it might not be readily apparent how it can be used. If you are a member of a research team there will be times when several of you are tasked with working together on a project. SearchTeam may help you organize and coordinate your efforts. A couple of years ago our group worked together on a white paper on industries that were faring well in the recession. SearchTeam would have been a tremendous help to us then. I’ll be curious to hear back from you about the research-related uses that you find for it.

Evernote

Another promising new tool is Evernote. It is sort of like a combination of Read It Later and SearchTeam. It helps you to capture websites, notes, screen shots, sounds, files or video and organize it all into notebooks. It is accessible from anywhere and works on all platforms.

I believe this is the simplest way I’ve yet come across to capture information in one place from so many disparate sources. As with Read It Later, it is a handy way to temporarily save sites. Deleting a notebook with everything you’ve saved on an entity you’ve researched only takes a couple of clicks. As with SearchTeam, you can share your notebooks with others so they can see the results of your work (read-only in the free version, read/write in the premium).

The free and paid versions of Evernote offer different levels of data storage, notebook sharing, searchability, etc. The free version is all many of us will need but the added features at the premium level are well worth the $45/year if you become a heavy user.

We’d like to hear from you about new (or old) tools that you use to make your work easier or more efficient. What is it, how does it work and what do you like best about it? Shoot us a comment below, or email us!

March 15, 2011 By Helen Brown 6 Comments

Can You Research Better Than A 4-Year Old?

When my nephew Jason was a little kid, he could drive me crazy with his questions. He’d start with “What is that man doing?” “He’s digging a hole.”

“Why?” “Well, he’s helping build a bridge.”

“Why?” “The old one washed out.”

“Why?” “Because there was a mudslide.”

“Why?”

Before I knew it, I was trying to explain global weather patterns and El Niño…and quickly getting w-a-y out of my depth. (Of course, this was before iPhones; I think I’d last a few more rounds now).

“Why?” is the question

In fundraising research, we need to be like four-year-olds every time we do our work. Every single time we come up against information that doesn’t quite make sense.

Why does that couple belong to a golf club on an island off the coast of Georgia? They live in New York. Their second home is in Colorado. What’s going on? Is their capacity to give larger than we think?

Why is our alumnus not responding to a 45-page proposal we labored over for two solid weeks? It was a sure thing – he asked us to put it together!

Why did a distinguished business leader suddenly change her giving priorities ten years ago? It used to be the environment, now she’s into medical research. Will she give to us?

Something’s just…off

When we research, facts that are asymmetrical should grab our attention and bug us like a stone in our sandal. We’re not just finding information, plonking it down in a report and throwing it over the transom in a factory line. Yawn. Another report done. Next.

The couple belongs to the island golf club because their third home is there, held in trust in a compound the wife’s grandfather, an oil baron, established. Fortunately on its website the golf club’s newsletter mentioned the great season-opening party at the couple’s house, with photos of the art collection and the back-story of the oil baron.

The alumnus mentioned in a newspaper interview years ago that he is dyslexic. Our alum hasn’t read the proposal and didn’t feel comfortable mentioning it.

The prospect’s sister died of a hereditary disease 10 years ago. In a video interview she discusses how she’s motivated to honor her sibling and find a cure for herself and her family.

These are three real examples* where asking “why?” made a make-or-break difference in our client’s success with engaging a donor. None of the answers were available on the three main search engines – they were found in deep web sources.

Every piece of research you do could make that difference

We have to keep at it ~ to keep asking “why?” Yes, it’s a lot more work, but it makes work a lot more interesting. We researchers live for that “Eureka!” moment, and there’s no better feeling than being part of a gift that transforms a donor, an organization and the people or cause we serve.

*Details changed to preserve anonymity

February 22, 2011 By Helen Brown 2 Comments

The Best All-In-One Research Tool

Clients ask me this question a lot:

“Which online prospect research tool should I buy?”

Then they’ll go on to say:

“My old colleague tells me to use this one because it’s really inexpensive, my consultants tell me I should use their product, and I just heard about something else that’s supposed to integrate with my database …I’m so confused! Which one is the best?”

It’s a really good question.

You’ve got limited time, limited staff and a limited budget. Wouldn’t you love to have a tool to be able to look up a name, push a button and get a perfectly-honed strategic research profile on that exact person?

Yeah, me too. I’m really sorry; it doesn’t exist. There is no push-button profile. Although I’m sure the good people at IBM are looking into ways to maximize Watson beyond Jeopardy!

Until then, there are subscription services to multi-database products designed to get as close as possible to this ideal. In alpha order, the largest services operating in this space are: DonorScape, DonorSearch, FindWealth Online, Prospect Research Online and ResearchPoint.

These products represent a portion of what I consider the Swiss Army Knives of the prospect research world. They package as many different databases as possible to help with the variety of wealth-and-philanthropy information needs of the typical development office. Most of these vendors also provide electronic screenings of your database, but you aren’t required to do a screening with the company to purchase access to their look-up service.

But which one is the best?

I guarantee you that within a week, you will know. You will need to commit about 5 hours of your time, but that time you spend could save you thousands of dollars (and a lot of aggravation). This is a big decision and depending on the size of your budget this could be a significant purchase for you. You want the most for your money and a tool that saves you time. So when you’re ready, just follow these three easy steps:

STEP ONE: Get the lay of the land

First, visit the vendors’ websites and spend 15 minutes familiarizing yourself with each company’s offering. You will notice some similar databases and features as well as some differences. Many of the vendors have pdfs with further information for you to download or print. If you’re a paper person, create a grid. If you’re a computer person, try Evernote or Zotero, two very cool tools for saving, filing, and creating notes online.

STEP TWO: Kick some tires

Now that you’ve gotten an overview, call the vendors of the products you’re most interested in. Arrange for all of the product demonstrations to happen on the same day. Why?

a) You will begin to form opinions quickly based on what you’re seeing from one product to the next in that short period.

b) If you ask, most of the vendors will provide a week’s worth of access to test their product after the demo, and you will be able to test them out side-by-side in the week ahead.

Smart, huh?

At this point I would recommend not asking about pricing. You want the best product for you, not just the cheapest. The one you select may actually end up being the least expensive, but don’t let that be a factor – yet.

STEP THREE: Take them for a test drive

Do the exact same searches across all of the products, entering names of donors and volunteers you know very well and those you don’t know well at all. Ten to fifteen of each group should give you the information you’ll need to make a solid decision.

Which had the easiest interface for you to use? Which was the most confusing?
Which gave you the most information? The least?
Which gave you the most accurate information based on what you already knew about your insiders? Which gave the most false hits?
How easy is it to build and store lists?

And some more general questions to ask yourself…

How much information do you need to know generally?
How much time do you have to sift through information?
What questions about prospects will you need to answer over the coming year?

The focus really sharpens now

Usually at this point a fairly clear ranking is emerging on the decision grid. If you’re ready to buy, now it’s time to call the sales rep(s) to get pricing for your top one(s).

DO: Ask for and call three references. How responsive is the vendor’s customer service? What do they love about the product and what do they find frustrating?

DO: Find out if a professional association you belong to has negotiated any special discounts with the vendor to maximize your budget.

DON’T: Just go with the service your best friend likes. Your organizations may be similar, but your situation is completely different from theirs.

Voila!

And there you have it – the very best prospect research Swiss Army Knife lookup service. You knew I was going to say this all along, didn’t you – it’s the one that’s best for you.

Note: I have specifically omitted tools like Lexis Nexis, Dialog, Factiva, Highbeam, Morningstar and others from this article because I consider them in a different category of information aggregators. But you can still use the techniques I’ve described above to determine which of those resources would be best for you, too.

February 14, 2011 By Helen Brown 1 Comment

Rescue from the Digital Firehose

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about content curation – ways to corral the rushing river of media coming at all of us. Because we are all drowning in too much information.

Information is a fire hose blasting at us full bore. If it’s not email, it’s Facebook. Blogs. White papers, professional journals and newsletters. RSS feeds and search alerts. Some of it we read, most of it we just don’t have time for.

It’s just crazy. New resources, new services, and even new data-stream-tamers are popping up every day. It can be overwhelming just deciding which filter to use.

Marketing ninja Mark Schaefer’s recent blog posting about hot new Q&A site Quora elicited this comment from Paul Gailey, another digital consultant:

Observations like that make me feel – ugh – overwhelmed for a second. It’s true – the information is only going to keep rushing at us. But there are LOTS of solutions. We have to filter out the noise, but we absolutely cannot afford to filter out the information that we need to see.

Here at HBG my team and I use several free and fee-based tools to help ourselves and our clients deal with the digital firehose. I’d like to show one of those easy-to-use free resources that I think you’ll find helpful. Maybe best of all, you’re not meeting some hot new untested thing. It’s familiar. It’s…

Your old pal, Google

You probably use Google every day, but do you have an iGoogle account? If not, you are truly missing something. Signing up is easy and free. Just click iGoogle on the top-right corner of your Google main page and sign up.

Now you can personalize your home page. Or, if you don’t want to, just skip to item 2. This is my personalized page with a beach theme at sunset (hey, it’s February. I live in Boston.):

There are a zillion themes from which you can choose – from beaches, Italian gardens and English lakes to [*ahem*] scenes that are clearly NSFW. <–(You don’t need to click that if you know what it means). Click “Change theme” (1) to select your choice.

Once you’ve done that click “Add stuff.” (2) That’s where you’ll find goodies called ‘widgets’ that add personalized news feeds, weather forecasts, stock market updates, Twitter, Facebook, and lots of other tools.

You can also set up web and news search alerts and have the alerts sent to your iGoogle page via an RSS feed. That way you’ll be the first in your office to know when a company goes public, someone’s portfolio soars, a foundation you’re tracking announces grants, or the $100-million gift across town gets announced.

But it gets even better. See on the left where it says “Edit this tab”? (3) (I clicked on the down arrow next to ‘Home’ to show you that pull-down window). If you select ‘Add a tab” you can create a new tabbed page – just like tabs on your web browser – and name it whatever you like.

I created this tabbed page for fundraising blogs I follow. You can create tabs by theme, geography, key influencers you’re following …and you can add or delete feeds easily as you find new thought-leaders to follow.

The information you need, curated for you

A ten-minute scan of your tabs first thing in the morning will get you up-to-speed on all the news. You’re not rooting all over the web to find the information you want; the content’s all coming to you. You can add new must-see sources as you find them. Most importantly, you’re not left unaware of critical information that you can’t afford to miss in this busy digital world.

For more about content curation and to find other tools professionals are using,

here are two articles to get you started:

The Content Strategist as Digital Curator, by Erin Scime on the blog A List Apart

Curation is the New Creation, by Paul Gillin on B2BOnline.

February 2, 2011 By Helen Brown 6 Comments

Google+Spam=Opportunity (for Bing?)

The Washington Post ran an article on Jan 30^th by Michael Rosenwald highlighting the increasing amount of spam on Google. Spammers have figured out a way to cheat the Google system and are now bringing it direct to you and me. It’s clogging up the works and many are starting to worry that Google isn’t taking the issue seriously enough.

How the spammers do it

1. Content farms – businesses created specifically to generate cheap and filling answers to popular search strings – are increasingly padding out the results.

According to Rosenwald, websites like eHow hire freelancers to write how-to articles on a wide variety of topics. The sites work hard to optimize the page content so that they get pushed to the top of search results, and because we trust Google’s algorithms to give us good hits, we click the link. And when we click the link, we’ve reinforced to Google that that link is what we’re looking for – Google ranks web pages in part based on how many click-throughs it gets. Once we actually see the page, we realize it’s crap, but now we’re there, we’ve committed. We’ve clicked. Crap.

2. Nickel-a-clickers – People that are paid to click links to bring a web page higher in the rankings.

Through employment matchup services like Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, spammers hire cheap labor to click on links in order to make their site seem more relevant. Every time the clickers click they get five cents, or whatever the agreed-on rate is. In order to earn a decent return, they have to click a lot of hotlinks. I can’t imagine the boredom that entails, but I suppose it’s pretty easy work.

I’d never heard of Mechanical Turk, so I thought I’d have a look-see. One of the jobs on offer: “CopyEditing and Logically Filling up of Blanks for Recipe Database.” Job description: “Check for grammer errors.” Oh good. Final comment on the job from the employer: “It doesn’t have to be factually correct. As long as the details seems plausible and logical it is fine.” Well, there’s another reason for sticking with reliable ol’ Epicurious.

Big deal, there’s more spam in Google results. Whatever.

You might say that now, but if spammers are enlisting armies of cheap labor to scam the system, Google’s in big trouble. Because if we all get fed up, there are several other big engines ready and waiting for the influx of search émigrés. And Google will be another name like Netscape or Northern Light that you think “Oh yeah! I used to use that all the time!”

And it means trouble for us, too, because some of the pages you click through to are going have more and more distasteful things on them. And like bedbugs they could start creeping onto your hard drive and lurk there.

Mud Man lurking - photo ©2005 Julie Kahn

What lurks beneath the surface?

Lurking things? Eww. Are there options?

Alternatives to Google include Bing, Blekko, and Exalead, just to name a few. Here at HBG, we check more than one search engine for every search we do and you might want to consider making it a habit too, if you aren’t already.

Here’s another reason why you might want to use more than one engine: studies in recent years by researchers at Penn State, the University of Kashmir, metasearch engine Dogpile and others have shown repeatedly that information overlap between search engines is very low, sometimes as little as 1% in the first page of returned results. You get a stronger variety of results if you cast your net wider.

[An interesting sidenote here: search guru Danny Sullivan posted an article on the Search Engine Land website yesterday titled “Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results.” Apparently Google set up a sting operation recently to prove that Bing has been lurking over their shoulders and copying search results. Sullivan’s article has pictorial evidence and everything. Will Bing just clone Google’s results, spam and all? I sure hope not.]

And finally, consider this: when you search Google or any search engine, you’re looking at a static database of web pages that were scanned in days, weeks or perhaps even months ago. Which is why sometimes when you click a link you won’t find the word you were looking for. The page was updated in the interim between when it was saved in the search engine’s database and when you clicked the link. One search engine may have cataloged a site yesterday and another last month. Or last year. For freshness, reliability and completeness, it just pays to use more than one search engine.

Now don’t get me wrong, I love Google. But this spam thing is starting to bug me. Are you concerned? Or is this much ado about nothing?