Helen Brown Group

By

Front Door Locked? Use the back door!

We just celebrated my colleague Jennifer Turner’s fourteenth anniversary with HBG (!), and one of the things Jen has become known for around here is her skill at tracking down hard-to-find information. In today’s article, Jen shares some of her tactics for finding contact information when the usual resources are less than helpful. Thanks, Jen! ~Helen

Jennifer Turner

Senior Consultant Jennifer Turner

Let’s face it – it isn’t easy getting a phone number for the likes of MacKenzie Scott (trust me, I’ve tried). I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s ever been given the daunting task of finding contact information for a famous philanthropist. It’s hard enough finding all their real estate assets, disguised under the names of various LLCs, let alone a direct phone number.

While it may be difficult reaching that donor directly, I am here to let you know that there is hope! Try reaching them through what I affectionately refer to as “the back door.” Below are some examples of alternative ways to connect your colleagues with those hard-to-reach prospects:

  1. Try to find the prospect’s personal assistant

Company websites usually just list the top executives, so you may need to dig a little deeper to find their assistants. I usually begin by searching the name of the prospect’s company in ZoomInfo’s “institution” tab. From there, I click on the list of individuals. Depending on the company, the number of names listed can range from a few to hundreds of thousands. I then sort this list by title, and scroll through until I find anyone whose title matches personal assistant, executive assistant, administrative assistant, etc. With any bit of luck, you will not only find the name of an assistant, but an email address and direct telephone number for them as well.

  1. Search within the prospect’s company’s website for “hidden” email addresses

Using an extension such as Hunter, you can quickly obtain a list of email addresses within a company’s website (note: Hunter offers a variety of subscriptions ranging in price, but even the free subscription gives you 25 monthly searches, so you won’t need to ask your supervisor to pay for another resource to have success with this method). Sometimes the email address will be accompanied by a complete name, and if you’re lucky, their title. Other times it will not. When I don’t have a name, I simply conduct a new internet search putting the email address in quotation marks. If/when I find the name, I can then run it through LinkedIn to see if I can obtain that person’s title. This method may sound a bit time consuming (which it can be) but has proven invaluable when I cannot find an email address for the actual prospect.

  1. LinkedIn

And speaking of LinkedIn, whether you have a paid subscription or use the free version (I use the free version), this can be a great tool for finding personal assistants. Look up the prospect’s company, then review its list of people. From this list, you can search employees by title, or you can simply scroll through the list of people to see if any titles are for an assistant. Once you have a name, you can then try to find their contact information in ZoomInfo or via an internet search. (Just remember that sometimes people hide their full names in LinkedIn.)

Of course, with these tips also come some hiccups…. 

Caveats

Sometimes there can be lots of administrative assistants. You can handle this a couple of different ways:

  • Include them all and let the fundraiser go from there.
  • Limit the ones you pass on to the fundraiser to those for which you have found an email address and a direct phone number.
  • Check to see if you can find the assistant’s location. Depending on the size of the company, the assistants may be scattered across various locations. Try to make sure the assistant’s name you provide is in fact employed at the same location as the prospect.

 

Outdated titles

  • People change jobs. Often. And sometimes information is outdated. Therefore, whenever possible, try to cross-check titles and companies to ensure the assistant is still, in fact, employed at your prospect’s company.

 

You simply cannot find an assistant.

  • It happens. When all else fails, try to give your colleague something. You may not be able to provide them with the prospect’s personal email or direct telephone number, but putting them in touch with a person whom they can refer to by name is the first step in getting them connected.

In conclusion….

 Don’t just give your fundraising colleagues a generic email (such as info@xxx.com) found on the main page of a company’s website, or their main business telephone number; take that extra step to provide your colleague with a specific name and a title, even if it isn’t for the intended prospect.

Chances are, they will have more luck speaking to an actual person this way, which can then lead to a future conversation with the desirable prospect. While it may be premature to expect an immediate call with the likes of MacKenzie Scott, there’s no harm in having an initial conversation with those connected to her. From there, you can let your colleague work their magic to get a meeting with a billionaire prospect.

 

By

Ch-ch-ch-changes: Why are musicians selling their catalogs?

Like many of us, HBG’s Jayme Klein noticed a trend in musicians selling their catalogs recently, and she decided to dig quite a bit deeper to help all of us understand what’s behind these massive sales. Thanks to Jayme’s article, we can see (much more) clearly now! ~Helen

Jayme Klein

       Senior Consultant Jayme Klein

Stevie Nicks. Bob Dylan. Blondie. Neil Young. Bruce Springsteen. Paul Simon. Sting. Tina Turner. Many famous musicians are making headlines these days. Not for a new album or a worldwide tour, but because they’ve sold their copyrights in multi-million dollar deals. Even those without decades-long careers, such as John Legend, Shakira, Justin Bieber and Timbaland, are cashing in on their past successes to ensure their futures. It doesn’t stop with those still among us, either. The estates of the late David Bowie and Bob Marley have also signed over publishing rights. What’s the deal?

It starts with what they’re selling.

As the Washington Post so helpfully explains, for nearly every song, there are two copyrights associated with it. It makes it easier to understand the process when you think of a song as a two-step process.

First, it has to be written. Then, it has to be recorded. These steps each have their own copyright. The composition (music and lyrics) and the master (the recording) can be owned by different entities and are different revenue streams. Your favorite cover song creates different claims of ownership: first, by the original composer and anyone who records a cover. An automatic fee is due every time someone records a cover. Another hiccup in the process is if an artist re-records their music (Taylor Swift) and creates multiple masters. This is highly uncommon. If a company or individual wants to license a song, this can get really complicated, as they have to contact the composer, the owner of the master(s) and any other owner. Phew.

An artist doesn’t have to sell it all at once. Neil Young sold 50% of his copyright in 2021. The company Primary Wave purchased a 50% stake in the estate of Whitney Houston, and only publishing from before 1964 by Ray Charles. Mick Fleetwood sold only the recorded rights to BMG.

While the trend is making news right now, in 1997, David Bowie got things started by creating Bowie Bonds, the first celebrity asset-backed investment. He raised $55 million through 10-year bonds backed by his royalties, with a 7.9% return. They matured in 2007, with the income rights returning to Mr. Bowie. While the phenomenon didn’t last, it helped stir thinking about music catalogs as an investment.

Lately, it seems that investors with deep pockets want to “work smarter, not harder” and own these copyrights if the owner is willing to sell. Songs with longtime appeal (hits that continue to be popular over many years) are considered a lower risk investment, than, say, a one hit wonder from a few summers ago. The new owner of “Like a Rolling Stone” will get revenue if it is used in a film, a commercial, or even played at your local restaurant.

What’s causing these musicians to cash in? It seems like some older musicians are planning ahead for their futures, especially since touring revenue has dried up during the pandemic. While few musicians are speaking out about their decisions, some, like David Crosby, have said that streaming services have dissolved their income sources. “If we could get paid for records and play live we would not be doing it. None of us.” Some may see leaving their families a large sum of money less complicated than managing their music catalogs after they are gone. Given the multitude of estates cashing in, this may prove true.

Per Rolling Stone, tax benefits are a primary reason for the especially successful. In 2006, the Bush administration signed a law which allowed musicians use catalog sales as capital gains, rather than income (which is taxed higher). If the Biden administration changes capital gains taxes for sales over $1 million, this would raise the rate from 20% to 37%. A one-time payment on the sale would save musicians a lot of money over time. The article notes that a younger artist, Shakira, is involved in a tax evasion investigation upwards of $16 million. Selling copyrights could be a more lucrative way to make that up than, say, selling a property.

How are the deals decided? Hipgnosis, a company that has purchased several catalogs, pays artists, on average, “14.76x historical annual income.” This means an average of 14.76 years of royalties. Depending on the artist, this may be higher or lower.

Those buying the catalogs are almost as varied as the artists themselves. Often, they are going to recording companies, such as Bruce Springsteen’s $500 million sale to Sony, Bob Dylan’s $400 million deal to Universal or David Bowie’s estate’s deal with Warner Chappell Music for $250 million. Most recently, Sting sold his back catalog to Universal Music as well for $250 million. Investment firms like Hipgnosis, Vine Alternative Investments and Eldridge are looking at music catalogs as a reliable investment and making deals with artist young and old alike. Stevie Nicks sold her catalog for $100 million to Primary Wave, a New York-based talent management and publishing firm.

What does this mean for researchers? The majority of musicians that we might investigate will not be making deals like this. However, it always helps to broaden our knowledge of what people are selling and what it could be worth. Thinking creatively about the arts and how prospects become high net worth individuals is never a bad investment.

 

 

 

By

A DAFinitive answer

It’s Research Pride Month, and boy oh boy do we have a celebration going on at the Helen Brown Group! If you have no interest in donor advised funds, you might want to skip today’s article and wait for next week.

But if you are, let me tell you what the party’s all about here at HBG:

A couple of years ago I got really frustrated by the lack of information about DAFs.*

It was a constant struggle for me and my team to find out:

  • Who are the people with DAF accounts?
  • When we’re researching a potential donor, how can we find out if they have a DAF so we can let our client know?
  • Why isn’t it possible to find DAFs based on their philanthropic interests? Or their geography?

So a few members of the HBG team and I began building a database of donor advised funds to use as a lookup when we did research for our clients.

And it started to grow. And grow. Ten thousand funds. Twenty thousand funds. Forty thousand funds. Fif…holy cow!

About a year ago it dawned on me that this would be helpful to researchers everywhere. Not just us at HBG, but a research resource created by prospect researchers for prospect researchers. Or for anybody, really, who is interested in DAFs and their donors.

It’s finally here and we’re ready – and super excited – to show it off to you. It’s called DAFinitive™.

What can you do here? Well, check out the search page:

  • The keyword box searches the entire database. That includes every field you see here as well as additional fields you don’t, like notes we might have found about the fund.
  • Or, you can search by the last name and first name of a donor or fund administrator.
  • Want to search for a list of DAFs in Florida that have an interest in animals? You can do that.

Is every DAF in DAFinitive™? Absolutely not, but we do have about 5% of the roughly one million DAFs estimated to be in existence, and we’re adding at least 1,000 funds every week.

We’re elbow-grease searching for those tough-to-find funds, too (you know the ones I mean…the ones held by sponsors that rhyme with Schwidelity and Billicon Salley that don’t list their funds anywhere aargh). Fair warning – if you’re thinking DAFinitive™ is going to solve your Fidelity-Charitable-is-a-black-box problem, I’m sorry, we’re not there yet. We do have a few of those funds – and growing, though.

That said, we’re happily crowdsourcing from everyone in the research community (hint hint!) who sends us a fund name and a URL to confirm it so if you want to see a fund in DAFinitive™, send it along!

Do we know how much is in each fund? No, but much to our surprise we did find a couple of sponsors that actually did list how much (or a range of how much) was in each fund account – that was a yahoo moment! And you might be as interested as we were to learn that the average fund size held in those commercial sponsors (like Fidelity and Schwab) is lower – by a lot – than in community or single-issue sponsors. (Check out the facts and figures below).

If you want to know more about DAFinitive™, there are lots more FAQs on the front page of the site (www.DAFinitive.com) – take a look to learn more.

Thanks for sharing my excitement! A heartfelt and massive thank you to the absolutely amazing beta testers who gave us honest and helpful feedback to bring DAFinitive™ to the launch pad.

Happy Research Pride Month!

*Not familiar with DAFs? Here’s a bit more information for you!

DAFs are philanthropic bank accounts that just about anyone can set up with one of the 976 sponsoring organizations in the US. Sponsors are regional community foundations, the nonprofit arm of a for-profit financial institution (also known as “commercial sponsors” or “national sponsors”) or a single-issue sponsor (like a university, religious-based community fund, etc.).

The donor gets a tax deduction when they deposit money into the account, and then they advise the sponsor to make donations from that account when they’re ready.

Lots of times information about those funds (and particularly about the donors) sits in a big black box. Many of the commercial DAF sponsors don’t publish anything about the funds they hold, and it’s hard for nonprofits to find out if someone has a DAF unless they make a gift. (And sometimes even then the nonprofit doesn’t find out who directed the gift if the sponsor doesn’t include that information with the donation!)

Want to know more about DAFs? Giving USA just released a fascinating report that is a must-read. Here are some key points from the report:

  • Many DAF accounts have multiple donors or administrators that make gifts from the fund. Vanguard Charitable reported in 2016 that 61 percent of their funds had both male and female donor/administrators.
  • DAFs provide much less of an administrative headache than setting up a personal or family foundation, and in recent years an increasing number of foundations have rolled their assets into DAFs.

Don’t miss the 2021 DAF Report, either, from the National Philanthropic Trust (NPT). 2021 marked their eleventh annual report about DAFs, and this edition holds some fascinating information. For example:

  • “Grants from DAFs to qualified charities totaled an estimated $34.67 billion, representing a 27.0 percent increase compared to 2019 and a new high-water mark. This is the highest DAF grant increase in a decade.”
  • In 2006 there were 160,000 donor advised funds in the United States with assets of about $31 billion. NPT reports that as of 2021 that number now stands at over 1 million funds with assets of nearly $160 billion. The majority of them are held with commercial sponsors (approximately 864,099), with another estimated 84,334 held at community foundations and 56,666 at single-issue charities.
  • The average size of a DAF account across all sponsor types is $159,019 but that average varies quite a bit between them. The average amount in a commercial-sponsor DAF is $115,901; in a community foundation it’s $543,553, and in a single-issue sponsor is $244,238.

 

By

The RiF Prospect Research Handbook is out today!

Lots of times we might have a brilliant idea to nudge forward (or perhaps even revolutionize) our profession, but then we think, ugh, is it worth it? That would take forever! And we go back to whatever it was we were doing before our daydream.

Fortunately for all of us that’s not what happened back in 2019 when Ben Rymer, then chair of Researchers in Fundraising (RiF), dreamed up the bold idea to create a soup-to-nuts Prospect Research how-to Handbook. In case you’re not familiar with RiF, it’s the professional association for prospect researchers in the UK. Just like Apra here in North America, RiF has a great conference every year (theirs is in November in London) as well as gatherings throughout the year.

The RiF Handbook (available today!), called Researchers in Fundraising: Best Practice Guide and Handbook for Prospect Research has been a labor/labour of love for many of us in the prospect research community. I was lucky enough to be one of the volunteer editors for a segment or two, and I was impressed at what a well-run machine it was, and what a great job that the project’s manager Ally Lee-Dudley, founder of Adcumulo, did of keeping the operation running so smoothly.

I was interested to learn more about the Handbook and the process of creating it, so I got in touch with Ben, Ally, and Chris Davis, RiF’s current chair, to find out more. Sincere thanks to Ben, Ally, and Chris for sharing these great insights!

Helen: Ben, how did the idea come about to do a Handbook for prospect researchers?

Ben Rymer: When I sent the initial proposal to the Chartered Institute of Fundraising (CIoF) in August 2019, I’d known for a while that a handbook/textbook/how-to guide was needed. My feeling was that prospect research was still something of a trade, rather than a profession or discipline. We have a huge amount of expertise, experience and goodwill in the community, but it had never completely crystallised into a finished product so we could build on and improve existing good practice.

HB: What was your initial plan for the scope of the project, and did that change at all as it evolved?

BR: All I knew was that the main areas of research practice should be included. Basically I wanted to create something that I would’ve found practically useful in my first job in the sector. We cast the net wide in starting, with plans for 23 chapters. The big trade-off since then has been in response to volunteer availability. All the content is crowd-sourced, and so we have to work in sequence with the expertise of volunteers who come forward … Also, Covid hit a short time after project kick-off, but we pivoted to remote working pretty well, thankfully.

HB: Ally, how did you get involved with the project?

Ally Lee-Dudley: My involvement with the project began in January 2020 when the Steering Group were looking for a Project Manager to move the Handbook from a great concept to a work in progress. At this time there were not yet any structures, processes, or resources in place so this really was the beginning of the Handbook as an active project.

HB: How many volunteers were part of it?

AL-D: To date around 90 volunteers have contributed to the Handbook, some as writers, some as editors, some as beta-readers, as some as micro-volunteers. Volunteers come from 3 different continents, and around a dozen different countries making the volunteer effort an international collaboration.

HB: How many chapters are there, and how was the decision made on which topics to include?

AL-D: At launch, 8 chapters are available for readers plus a Resource Director and Glossary of industry terms and phrases. There are another 7 chapters in progress which will be published as and when they are completed and a further 11 chapters that are yet to be started. Publishing content on a staggered basis like this means we are able to start getting useful content out and into the prospect research community far more quickly than if we wait for a ‘complete’ Handbook. The original list of potential chapters was developed through discussions between the volunteers who make up the RiF Committee. Over time several additional chapters have been added to that list as a result of suggestions made by volunteers involved with the project.

HB: Chris, as the scope of the project evolved, what changes did that cause you to make?

Chris Davis: As we added more chapters to the Handbook, we found ourselves looking beyond our immediate peer group for input and advice, to those with specific expertise or lived experience. For example, in our chapter on Strategic International Prospecting, we were aware that we needed to get as much input as possible not only from researchers with extensive knowledge of international prospect research, but also from those with experience of living or working in different countries and communities. This was definitely a challenge, but I hope we got the balance right! Similarly, when we start work on the chapter on Equality, Diversity & Inclusion in Prospect Research we’ll be seeking involvement from those who are experts in the ED&I space.

HB: What surprised you most about the process, or what created the most changes or opportunities as things went along?

CD: I think I was surprised by how much content we ended up generating! I knew that the prospect research community would be hugely generous with their time and knowledge, but I was still taken aback at times by the volume of work we ended up producing. At this point I’d have to give a big shout out to our beta-reading and editing volunteers, who were a major help in clarifying and refining the chapters and getting them to where they are now.

HB: Ben, what do you think are the top 3 things that readers will find that might surprise them?

BR: 1. Reach: it is a big thing! Chapters I’ve worked on have ended up being 10,000-20,000 words long. We also have a very broad range of topics, so I think readers will be pleasantly surprised at that.

  1. What’s still to come: by the same token, there are some big chapters in the pipeline, so reader may be left waiting for those. If anyone has suggestions, please feel free to get in touch via the Handbook website, www.rifhandbook.info.
  2. Quality: we’ve put a lot of effort into making the content as good as it can be. For a wholly volunteer-generated initiative I think it is a solid product, but I’m biased of course!

HB: Chris, what do you think are the top things that you think readers will find most useful in the Handbook?

CD: I think that will be different depending on the needs and experiences of readers – throughout the Handbook we’ve tried to ensure that content is relevant for both those who are new to prospect research and for experienced researchers who are looking to innovate and upskill.

For early-career researchers or those who are setting up a prospect research function, we hope our New Researchers Guide chapter and the chapter on The Prospect Research Role will be invaluable. Within the Data & Skills Domain of the Handbook, there is some very detailed, nuanced, and in-depth content on estimating wealth and assigning capacity ratings – topics that we know are of eternal interest to prospect researchers and fundraisers alike!

Finally, we’ve made extensive use of case studies throughout the Handbook, drawn from the real-life experiences of researchers. We hope these will really bring the content the life and illustrate how the principles and techniques outlined in the Handbook can be applied practically.

HB: Chris, what did you enjoy most about the process?

CD: I’ve really enjoyed the experience of being involved in creating content for the Handbook, especially the early stages of this where you are exchanging knowledge with your peers. I’ve been working in prospect research for over a decade, but being involved with the Handbook has absolutely encouraged to rethink some of my settled views about the work that we do, and how we do it. I think the Handbook does reflect this process of peer exchange, and I hope that everyone who uses it will find something new and different in there that challenges their assumptions.

HB: Ally, What tools did you use for collaboration on this massive project and how well did they work? If you had another large collaborative project to undertake, would you use the same tools?

AL-D: The Handbook was always intended to be primarily a remote project, so in that sense we were lucky and the pandemic didn’t significantly affect our plans. In order to help ensure both accessibility of tools at no cost for volunteers and to help embed project sustainability by keeping the financial burden of the project low for RiF, we’ve largely drawn on tools that are available for free. As a Steering Group, our project management hub is a tool called Freedcamp, and this enables us to plot and track actions, deadlines, and milestones and assign task accountability at a strategic level.

For the Handbook’s wider volunteer community, the free version of MS Teams is our collaborative workspace. Teams provides us with a place to create, share, and store documents such as meeting agendas and action plans, and to work collectively on producing and editing content in real-time whilst being able to communicate quickly and easily with each other. Within Teams volunteers can access the web versions of MS Word and Excel so we’re all using the same tools to ensure compatibility plus there is in-build versioning history and storage back-up for those ‘just in case’ moments.  We’ve recently made the switch from using Zoom for our regular meetings to using MS Teams’ video calling service; it doesn’t quite have all the same features as Zoom but it does come at zero cost rather than requiring a subscription to hold meetings for small groups for up to an hour at a time.

The Handbook itself is created using a custom-made WordPress website. We chose the route of e-publishing over hard copy for several reasons and the WordPress platform, with its almost unlimited flexibility and versatility, is the best fit to meet the Handbooks needs both now and in the future. As an e-publication it is not only much easier to keep the Handbook content up to date, it is also far simpler to ensure its availability to readers around the world who can access the content from any device with a web browser.

Overall, aside from the usual occasional IT glitch, (we’ve done the equivalent of turn it off and on again once or twice), the tools we’ve chosen have been effective and created not only a conduit for remote productivity and development, but also a space to come together a a community and experience that sense of being part of a team working towards a common goal that is so important to the Handbook.

Many thanks again to Ben, Chris, and Ally for sharing the inside scoop on the RiF Prospect Research Handbook, and for all of the hard work and coordination that went into creating it! Check out the Handbook website at www.RiFHandbook.info. If you would like to be a volunteer writer or editor for future chapters, please visit this page to learn more.

By

Expanding our view on HNWI and their real estate holdings

The year 2020 was weird all around. A global pandemic raged across the globe like the wildfires in California. The stock market blithely ignored it and soared.

The supply chain was MacGyvered on the fly with duct tape and dental floss by businesses scrambling to get products out of warehouses and into peoples’ houses. Meanwhile, the technology industry Zoomed ahead.

Also, global wealth rose 7.6%. An additional 6% more people in the world moved up a rung to become official high net worth individuals (HNWIs). Six percent more people wondering where on Earth to put all that extra cash.

Places we go to find that out

[Read more…]

By

There’s No Business Like Show Business

This week we welcome HBG Senior Researcher and LA resident Mandi Matz to the blog to talk about all things Hollywood – and in particular, movie magic and money. Mandi provides us with some great resources for finding compensation and deeper financial information on everyone involved in bringing entertainment to our screens, large and small. ~Helen

        Mandi Matz

I’ve lived in Los Angeles for more than 15 years. While I’m not originally from LA, I think of it as my adopted home now. When I meet people from other states and mention where I live, I inevitably get asked two questions:

  1. Do I go to the beach every day?
  2. Do I see movie stars all the time?

The answer to both questions is “no,” but I did recently see a Hollywood A-lister at my local coffee shop.

[Read more…]

By

Real estate and the wealthy right now

When the pandemic struck last year, (those who could) moved into their summer homes or took long rentals outside of whatever city they lived in. Since that time, there has been a reshuffling of thinking about what it means to be employed full-time and if employers will maintain offices, move to a hybrid office/work from home (WFH) situation, or just close their offices permanently.

That means that in vacation areas especially the real estate market is booming. Houses are selling within hours, some sight-unseen, for cash – and well above asking price. It’s a good time to be a real estate agent, especially if you like working 20/7. It’s also a great time to be a seller (as long as you have somewhere else to live lined up). It’s not great to be someone who is looking for a primary – or first-rung-on-the-ladder home.

Pension and private equity firms are changing the market

Institutional money pockets are as deep as the Mariana Trench right now, and those investors have to diversify their portfolios. Real estate is a great way for them to do that. What that means is that they are becoming some of the largest real estate owners in the country and are driving up prices up so that the average home seeker is getting shut out of the process.

With medium-sized investors refurbishing medium-sized homes to flip to institutional investors, it means that monthly rental fees are going up, too, for those homes that are left.

According to real estate research and investment firm John Burns Real Estate Consulting, one in five homes in the US is owned by someone who will never live in it. In Houston, investors currently account for nearly a quarter of all recent home sales. Investors aren’t just buying houses and apartment buildings, either – they’re buying whole neighborhoods.

UHNWIs

Moving down the food chain ever so slightly, what about ultra-high net worth individuals (UHNWIs) – those with a mere $30 million and more? What does real estate look like for them? How did the pandemic change their attitudes toward where they want to live?

Respected real estate firm Knight Frank publishes their Wealth Report annually, and this year’s version had fascinating insights. Just over a quarter of UHNWIs expect to buy a new primary residence this year in a coastal or rural location. Their primary goal is to have access to open spaces near their main dwelling, and their plan is to have this upgraded residence also serve as their office (or be very close to their work-place).

90% of those surveyed said that international travel would be significantly curtailed due to ongoing concerns about COVID-19, so that makes the home-as-getaway even more important.

In terms of holdings, primary and secondary homes make up about a quarter of UHNWIs investment portfolios. Their interest in investing in commercial property is way down (imagine that!) but – just like pension and private equity firms – their interest is way up for owning rental properties.

So what does this mean for prospect research and fundraising?

Well, a lot. This real estate financing situation is a whole separate world that is important for those of us in fundraising to read about to understand what’s going on with money moving around. Here are 3 specific things to consider:

  • Your nonprofit’s UHNW donors may be on the move, so keeping in touch will be even more important this year.
  • While it’s true that a donor will never* give an organization their residence(s), real estate can be an important indicator of wealth. Use the ratios and percentages in reports like the Knight Frank Wealth Report and the Capgemini World Wealth Report to help you get a sense of your prospect’s capacity when you are creating ratings.
  • This is a real estate bubble. Bubbles always burst, and we won’t know the size of it until it happens. Historically, people and institutions that are heavily invested in certain types of real estate (commercial real estate, for example) may struggle if they put too many eggs in that basket. If the top of your donor pyramid has a lot of people in this category, now would be a good time to make some asks and to think about diversifying your prospect portfolios soon.

What else? If you share this on your social channels, I’d be interested to hear your thoughts about this. I’m at @AskHelenBrown on Twitter.

*this is not actually a true statement. See planned giving.

 

By

Can your prospects be found at a luxury private community?

To start off the new year on The Intelligent Edge, we hear from my colleague Heather Hoke who shares her knowledge on luxury private communities – their costs and amenities. If you have prospects and donors living in a private community, check out the resources Heather references below. ~Helen

It’s been a rocky start to 2021 and it wasn’t too long ago that I was saying how excited I was to leave 2020 behind and start a new year! Given everything, it’s not surprising that so many of us are ready for a change in geography, including the wealthy.

Many people are migrating from densely populated urban areas, to a place they can have peace-of-mind and feel a sense of security. Private residential club communities may be attractive to buyers now in the time of COVID-19. Stay-at-home mandates and social isolation may factor into an increased interest in resort lifestyle communities that are full of amenities.

You can be in any stage of life to live in a private community, but some are targeted specifically for families, retirement, or active adults over 55. Communities offer a variety of exclusive concierge services and amenities including an array of fitness and recreational activities, dining, social activities and even security and medical staff. It comes at a significant cost as the properties require an initiation fee and annual dues. Buyers are not only buying a home, but they are also buying a lifestyle.

Let’s explore some of the most exclusive private residential communities….

Bighorn Golf Club in Palm Desert, CA

www.bighorngolf.com

Bighorn is described as casual and comfortable. There are 470 residences and 520 club members. The $100K initiation fee for club membership includes two championship golf courses, social activities, dining venues, tennis and pickle ball, pools, a fitness center, a salon and spa, personal training, and nutritional counseling. There is also private jet and transportation services, and an ultraluxe auto gallery to house members beloved cars. A golf membership is an additional $250K. Current homes for sale are going for up to $9.6 million.

The Hideaway in La Quinta, CA

www.hideawaygolfclub.com

The real estate on the 600 acres includes 447 homes, ranging from designer-built bungalows and villas to custom-built homes of up to 10,000 square feet. Current real estate listings go up to $4.5 million. There is a $75K fee to join The Hideaway Golf and Country Club which is limited to 580 members. Along with two renowned 18-hole golf courses and a 51,000-square-foot clubhouse, recreational facilities feature a world-class spa, fitness center, pool, and sports courts.

Kohanaiki in Kailua-Kona, HI

https://kohanaiki.com

Kohanaiki features a Rees Jones-designed oceanfront golf course, a sports complex, and an Adventure Team that serve as personal guides to the island’s natural attractions of surfing, stand-up paddling, snorkeling, and diving and deep-sea fishing on Kohanaiki’s 39-foot boat. The 67,000-square-foot clubhouse is a place of relaxation and wellness that includes a spa, infinity pools, yoga lawns, relaxation areas and sweeping views of the ocean. It also has a bowling alley, movie theater, private dining rooms, a wine and cheese tasting room, cigar room, and poker room. There is even a master brewer crafting one-of-a-kind beers onsite. Current real estate listings go up to $12.5 million.

Kukui’ula in Koloa, HI

https://kukuiula.com

The 1,010-acre property designed for families offers outdoor adventure experiences, a 10-acre organic farm, hiking trails, spa, and an 18-hole golf course-dubbed one of the best courses in Hawaii by Golf Digest. On staff is a “cultural resource liaison” who oversees programming that delves into island culture, including lei making, hula dancing classes and sunset ritual ceremonies. Kukui’ula offers a range of home ownership opportunities from large home sites to villas and bungalows. Homes range from $600K to $12 million. 

The Madison Club in La Quinta, CA

https://madisonclubca.com

The Madison Club is a community with quiet neighborhoods of luxury estate residences, elegant villas and clubhouse suites. It offers a Tom Fazio-designed golf course, movie theater, game room, full-service spa, a fitness facility, on-site medical practitioner, and a “recreational and lifestyle wellness team.” Initiation fee is $200K plus $33K in dues. 

Ocean Reef Club in Key Largo, FL

www.oceanreef.com

This community is on a private peninsula and has its own 4,000-foot airstrip, school, museum, security force, and fire department. A marina with 175 slips and docks for yachts up to 175 feet are also offered. To live in Ocean Reef, a resident must be sponsored by two current members and purchase a membership for $200K.

Royal Palm Yacht and Country Club in Boca Raton, FL

www.rpycc.org

This 450-acre community has 700 estates, many on deep-water and golf course lots. Royal Palm is internationally acclaimed as one of the most exclusive yachting communities in the country. Notable features include a Jack Nicklaus Signature golf course and full-service marina. Membership is by invitation and the candidate selection process is overseen by the members. Current real estate listings go up to nearly $17 million.

Silo Ridge Field Club in Amenia, NY

https://siloridge.com

On 800 acres, Silo Ridge opened in 2018 and is a project of Discovery Land Company, a developer and operator of some of the world’s most exclusive residential club communities. Silo Ridge has $250 million worth of amenities, including a Tom Fazio-designed golf course with gourmet snack stations, an organic garden, farm-to-table dining, hunting, fishing, hiking, mountain biking, an equestrian center, a spa, an outdoor theater, and a pool with a 150-foot water slide. About a 90-minute drive from Manhattan, Silo Ridge is especially appealing to NYC residents. There are 245 predesigned houses priced at an average of $5 million and going up to more than $10 million. Members pay annual dues of $24K and an initiation fee of $100K. Silo Ridge has vertical membership where members’ children and parents also become members.

The Summit Club in Las Vegas, NV

https://summitclubnv.com

This ultra-luxury resort community on 555-acres had its first residents in 2018 and has contracted 154 of its 260 lots, pre-built residences, and clubhouse suites. There is a clubhouse for dining and events, a pickleball facility, sports and tennis courts, and a championship golf course designed by golf architect Tom Fazio. It also has mountain biking and hiking nearby in Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area, a kid’s club, and residential services in which staff will do everything from grocery shopping to a turn-down service and housekeeping. Some of the homes built were more than $20 million. The average custom lot sells for more than $3.5 million. Club membership is $200K, annual dues are $39K and homeowner’s association fees are $16.8K.

Yellowstone Club in Big Sky, MT

https://yellowstoneclub.com

Yellowstone Club is the world’s only private ski and golf community. Designed by Discovery Land Company, it is situated in the Rocky Mountains spanning 15,200 acres with 2,900 acres of ski trails and an 18-hole golf course. There is a 282-acre ranch under contract there for $18 million and custom homes ranging from $11 million to $29 million. The grounds are reportedly protected by a security team that is led by a former Secret Service officer and it has its own fire department and emergency medical services team. The Club is limited to 864 members. Initial membership fees are $400K, and there is an annual fee of $41.5K.

 

These properties seem to have everything you will ever need to ease even the most stressed mind and body!

You can do some prospecting around private communities too. A helpful resource is the Private Communities Registry (www.privatecommunities.com) which is searchable by state for various community-types including gated, golf, luxury, and equestrian communities. Perhaps some of your constituents already live there!

In 2021, I am looking for wellness, peace of mind, and to be outside in nature as much as possible. Now I need to figure out a way to move to Kohanaiki! Since there is a master brewer on staff there, I have buy-in from my husband!

By

December edition – Who’s Doing Well Now?

It’s been eight months since I did a blog post on the topic of “Who’s Doing Well Now” and I thought the end of the year – giving season – might be a good time to revisit that question.

If you read that original blog post and the follow-up white paper, many of the industries from that period remain at the top, but over the summer innovation (and pivotation) pushed a few other companies and industries into the spotlight. I wanted to share my resources to help you dig a little deeper to find prospects that might be flying under the radar a bit.

For example, it’s not a secret that puzzles and games are doing well, so of course we should look into who makes them. Manufacturers like privately-held (and very diversified) Allied Materials and Equipment Co. of Kansas City, MO, whose subsidiary Allied Products is the maker of Springbok puzzles, are doing well this year. According to their website, Allied also makes American flags that fly “over some of our nation’s most important institutions as a result of contracts with the United States Senate, Department of Defense, and GSA recipients.” Those flags are also used for military (and veteran) keepsakes and burials, which unfortunately have seen an uptick this year. Allied’s DOD contracts also extend to military equipment, such as chem/bio life support systems.

Want to find more suppliers with US government contracts? There’s a database for that: https://www.usaspending.gov/. You don’t have to know the name of the company, either. If you’re prospecting, the surprisingly well-built search tool allows for a large array of filters, including recipient (awardee) type, NAICS code, state, zip code, and congressional district.

Specifically interested in companies that have received contracts for COVID-related purposes? You can find that on the USASpending site, but ProPublica has also created a very search-friendly tool at https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus-contracts/ for finding companies that have recently increased sales due to government contracts.

In the Washington, DC area, it would be natural to think that the fastest growing company would be a government contractor. Holistic Industries, which has grown 447% over the past three years and is considered an essential business will probably not be a DOD contractor anytime soon, though. The cannabis retailer reported growth over 30% for the first quarter this year and beat estimates for Q3 by $3 million. CEO and University of Maryland alumnus Josh Genderson has hopes to double sales next year. Cannabis retailers can’t use traditional banks to park their money, and they frequently donate to local nonprofits to prove their place in building up community. If your nonprofit doesn’t include cannabis retailers in your due diligence ‘no-no’ list, you may want to check out your local retailer’s leadership.

With the disruptions in the supply chains over the past several months, grocery retailers have needed to utilize more cold storage facilities to keep things fresh and relatively close-by. Two companies control nearly 60 percent of all of the cold storage in the US – Lineage Logistics and Americold Realty and both are growing quickly, according to The Wall Street Journal. The CEOs of both companies are graduates of Midwest universities that mention nonprofit interests on their LinkedIn pages.

I found the three specific company examples mentioned above by searching for “companies doing well” and limiting my search dates, but there are other resources (stronger than a search engine) that you can use to prospect for successful industries and companies (and the people who are doing well because of them) right now.

One of my all-time favorites is an expensive resource that used to be found only in hard copy in business libraries: ValueLine. Imagine my delight when I learned earlier this year that not only is ValueLine online and searchable, but my library card to my little local library gives me free access to it. (Maybe yours does, too?) ValueLine gathers information about 6,000 publicly-held companies and 18,000 mutual funds (as well as other invest-ables) and provides insights on which companies and industries are “timely” (how they’re doing as compared to others in their industry) and “safe” (the likelihood that the company will continue to do well over the coming months – or not) at the current moment.

My search in ValueLine this week showed that 26 companies are at the Venn diagram nexus for both growth and safety. The list includes several you’d expect like Clorox, Costco, General Mills, Home Depot, JM Smucker, Procter & Gamble and Walmart, with a few interesting ones like Jack Henry & Associates (payment processors for the financial services industry); Landstar (shipping and logistics); and Synopsys, an electronic design automation company focusing on silicon design, verification, and intellectual property and software security and quality.

Another resource to check for companies doing well right now is the Fortune Global Fastest 100, a listing of the fastest-growing companies in the world. I like to break their list down into industries to get an overview of sectors that are growing quickly in order to spot trends and outliers. This year the top three categories for growth are commercial banks; homebuilders, engineering, construction, and building materials; and internet services and retailing.

One last resource I wanted to mention is LinkedIn. Since it was first published on March 31, senior editor Andrew Seaman’s article, “Here’s Who’s Hiring Right Now” has been regularly updated. Its long list of companies that are doing well enough to be hiring this year is worth a look for prospecting ideas.

What places are you looking when you’re prospecting these days?

By

What on Earth is a SPAC?

A few weeks ago I was doom-scrolling Twitter and saw a link to yet-another article about SPACs and thought, “I really need to know more about these things.” My colleague, Kenny, has been casually dropping the term in our team meetings for a while, while talking about research he’s been doing, and I realized it was about time I stopped faking that I knew what he was talking about.

So I did a search and got lots of articles about Space-X, because “SPAC” and Twitter’s sub-par search engine don’t mesh. Sigh.

My bad…

If you’re looking for a lost shoe, chances are good it’s not in the refrigerator.

So I stopped being lazy and did the smart-researcher thing, which was to go directly to Investopedia. I knew it would have the answer, and who has time to waste? (Well, me apparently, because I fell through the prospect research rabbit hole and spent another two hours learning about SPACs!)

There are lots more resources I’m going to link you to at the end of this article that explain things fairly clearly including a fascinating, detailed, inside-baseball explainer from Bill Gurley, a venture capital deal-maker in Silicon Valley.

But first, I’m going to share the basics.

A SPAC is a Special Purpose Acquisition Company. Anybody can start a SPAC. You can start a SPAC. You don’t need a special license or anything. You just need to be able to raise money. (Hmmmmm)

A SPAC is a publicly-held shell company formed by an investor or group of investors, also known as sponsors. These sponsors usually have knowledge or expertise in a certain industry sector.

The ultimate purpose of a SPAC is to merge that shell with a promising privately-held company in order to take that company public without the hassle or cost of the traditional IPO process.

The sponsors will do a roadshow to institutional investors like family offices and private equity firms to drum up interest in investing in this shell company. You might see a SPAC referred to as a “blank check” company, because investors are essentially putting money toward something that doesn’t exist yet.

The sponsors might (or might not yet) have a few companies in mind that they will approach for a merger, and they’re not supposed to tell the investors even if they know – at this stage anyway (more on that in a minute).

Anyone can invest in a SPAC, too, including you and me. Shares traditionally open at $10 each.

Once there’s enough money in the pot, it goes into a blind trust. The SPAC has 24 months in which to acquire/merge with the target company. If they aren’t able to do that within 24 months, all of the money gets returned to the investors.

Now, once the SPAC sponsors have decided on a company to merge with, they can go back to the institutional investors and tell them (in confidence) about it, and ask if they want to put in more money. This is what is called a PIPE deal – a “private investment in public equities.” It sounds a little sketchy, but institutional investors are not allowed to share this insider information, and they’re not allowed to trade their shares for four months after the merger. Retail investors – you and me – can sell or buy anytime.

Who’s making money, how, and how much?

So let’s say the SPAC merges with a privately-held company. What happens then? Who makes money? How do they make money?

Let’s start with the sponsors. They make money in fees: 2% of the SPAC’s value plus $2 million for administration. Plus any profit off of the sale of shares or increase on money they put in.

The owners of the privately-held company make money when their shares increase in price and/or they sell them. In addition, they save money because the IPO process is expensive, with lawyers and investment banks and lots of other people to pay. By merging with a SPAC, they’ve avoided all of that payout.

The institutional investors make money when their shares of stock increase in price. In addition, when they originally invested they were likely also given a warrant to buy future shares of stock at a discounted price at/after a particular date. Assuming that the share price has gone up, that can make for a tidy profit.

So that’s the overview of SPACs. Don’t miss these articles and resources that fill in more of the gaps:

The Helen Brown Group LLC
489 Mt. Auburn Street, Suite 4
Watertown, MA 02472
617-393-1983
info@helenbrowngroup.com
Helen Brown Group